Dear sir, - "Leon" seems to have failed to realise the versatility of "London Life", or else he is unreasonable in expecting that only subjects he is interested in should be dealt with.
"London Life" in its correspondence covers a greater range than any other journal in Great Britain, including matters other magazines do not touch.
As a new reader I have been delighted to read the letters on long hair and one-legged ladies, because of certain associations. In stage life I have seen lots of lovely long hair; and as regards monopedes, I had a sweetheart who had lost a leg. She was sweet and happy but later Death claimed her, and I have not since been able to get a monopede friend. I therefore eagerly read every word in "London Life" on these two topics, and hope that letters full of details about them will continue to appear.
I suggest that the elastic nature of the correspondence in "London Life" provides "Leon" with the opportunity of reading about whatever he may be greatly interested in.
I thank "Click" for his further contribution. I also hope "Another Monopede" will write further details of her progress and adventures.
I have two postcard albums of longhaired beauties, mostly actresses, which I am willing to place at the disposal of the Editor for reproduction if acceptable.
Yours truly,
Long Tresses Adorent.